[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5346] Is Ruby "enough better"?

From: Gabriel Lima <Gabriel.Lima@...>
Date: 2000-10-09 18:40:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5346
Hi.
First of all, please don't flame me, or misinterpret my question.  I am
quite sure that you people
receive questions regarding Ruby in comparison to other languages all
the time, but that is not what
I am after.

The question I am formulating is related to Python (as Python seems to
be the closest match,
due to its OOP features, and being both scripting languages), but it is
not related to whether
Ruby is better than Pyhon, but rather to the question of if the
differences really are so great,
that the switch is worth it.

Python has the undeniable advantage of:
* more libraries.
* more books (3-4 for Python, one coming up for Ruby).
* more online documentation.
* a larger established user base (hey, programming alone is no fun).
* at least one "killer app" (I am of course talking about Zope).
* more commercial support (several companies are using Python/JPython
internally).

So, having all of the above present., is Ruby really a "so much" better
language to the extent
that  it is worth it to make the switch?  Because I don't know about
you, but I am not willing to
learn YAL (Yet Another Language), just because a few better quirks or
eye candy. If I am
switching to another language, it really have to be substantially and
noticeably better than
the previous one.

There, I've said it. I am really curious about your answers, I've been
reading a lot
of Ruby articles, but I have really not grokked it's apparent "Holy
Grail of programming"-ness.
I am sure that I am not the only one. Please enlighten me.  :-)

/ Gabriel Lima



In This Thread

Prev Next