From: Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Date: 2000-10-13T12:10:02+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:5492] Re: Object.foo, setters and so on

Hi,

At Fri, 13 Oct 2000 00:17:02 +0900,
matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:
> |I think it's not consistent with other top-level methods.
> |It's enough to print a warning message on the definition, isn't
> |it?
> 
> I don't feel it's inconsistent (see `initialize').  It's a matter of
> choice.  We can choose either a) make it public b) leave private with
> warning.

I prefer b because I don't like implicit method visibility
changes.
How about others?

Shugo