[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5807] Re: Windows InstalShield question

From: Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...>
Date: 2000-10-23 17:10:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5807
Dave Thomas wrote:

> Folks:
>
> You install Ruby using the InstallShield-based installed. It creates
> the directories, sticks the files in them, updates file associations
> in the registry, and creates a program group.
>
> Sp far, all pretty standard.
>
> My question is: would you also expect it to add the Ruby bin directory
> to your PATH? Which would be the least surprising: updating PATH or
> not?
>
> Dave

If at all possible, ask.  You might also consider creating a bat file that
executes ruby and adds it to the path for the duration of the execution.
I've set this up by hand for a few programs, because I didn't want my path
to get any longer.
OTOH, it's sure nice to know how you expect the path to be set, and adding
it in the autoexec file gives some pretty explicit documentation.  But my
path is already so long that documentation is how I would need to use it.
If you do add it, be sure you add it to the tail.  Adding it to the front
is a recipe for disabling other applications that I already depend on.




-- (c) Charles Hixson
--  Addition of advertisements or hyperlinks to products specifically
prohibited



In This Thread

Prev Next