[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5246] Re: Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question

From: "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
Date: 2000-10-03 01:07:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5246
Hmm... I speak only English (and a little German,
which in this case is useless as a screen door
on a submarine).

I wonder if "organize" is better than "classify"?

Hal

----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com>
To: ruby-talk ML <ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp>
Cc: <ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp>
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 4:18 AM
Subject: [ruby-talk:5226] Re: Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question


> 'Because all of Ruby has been...' -> 'Because Ruby has been...'?
>
> Okay. (I wanted to get the idea of the 全体 (zentai) in there somehow.)
>
> > Because all of Ruby has been designed with the principles of object
> > orientation in mind, it can classify its rich and powerful
> > functionality in ways that are easy to understand.
>
> Jon
>
> --
> Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com>
>


In This Thread