[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5643] Re: lint?

From: Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Date: 2000-10-17 14:37:12 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5643
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, [iso-8859-1] Aleksi Niemelwrote:

> > But you will have tested it with RubyUnit by then.... :-)  My 
> > docs for it in English are at:
> > http://www.eng.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~hgs/ruby/ruby-unit.html
> 
> Very nice docs!

Thank you.
> 
> I might comment that I like to separate test classes to separate files (and
> even directories) as it makes easier to deliver production code packages,
> and separates them from development versions.

I like to keep them together so they can't get lost! :-)
> 
> Another point is, that since 0.2.x where I guess x > 3, the RubyUnit package
> has included a script called c2t.rb, which creates the skeleton for a test
> class for you. It does not handle many different cases, but works very well

I didn't spot that.  I will have another look later.  Thanks.

> for simple cases. And never again you have to copy the code defined in 'if
> __FILE__ == $0'.
> 
> 	- Aleksi
> 
	Thank you,
	Hugh
	hgs@dmu.ac.uk


In This Thread

Prev Next