[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5452] Re: Editor recommandations?

From: schneik@...
Date: 2000-10-12 08:32:08 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5452


Hi,

Michel wrote:

# On Thu, 12 Oct 2000  11:46:50 +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
# > Ah, you're missing my trivial emacs function:
# >
# >    (defun ruby-xmp-region (reg-start reg-end)
#
# For the vim-dudes a trivial mapping:
#
# map <M-F10> :!ruby -r xmp -n -e 'xmp($_, "\%l\t\t\# \%r\n")'<CR>
#
# Highlight code using shift-v and hit meta-f10.

Thanks Dave and Michel and Gotoken--hope this tip ends up in the Ruby FAQ.

Another bit of information that may help out others is that the Ruby xmp
library is something you have to get from the RAA, which will point you to
this page for downloads:

    http://www.notwork.org/~gotoken/ruby/p/xmp/

This suggests an interesting evaluation mode for some future Ruby IDE:

a = ""                  # => ""
b = "s #{a}so"          # => "s so"
c = " i#{b} c"          # => " is so c"
d = "is#{c}oo"          # => "is is so coo"
e = "Th#{d}l!"          # => "This is so cool!"

Since this is something every Ruby unit should always have on tap, how
about making the mere 227 line xmp library part of the standard Ruby
distribution?

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)



In This Thread

Prev Next