[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5836] Re: Q's on limit/depth in dump/_dump

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-10-25 05:00:11 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5836
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:5658] Q's on limit/depth in dump/_dump"
    on 00/10/18, Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se> writes:

|Some questions on the limit/aDepth in dump/_dump related to 
|the following sample code:
|
|class C
|  def _dump(aDepth)
|    puts "depth = #{aDepth}"
|    "" # Dummy
|  end
|end
|#Marshal.dump([C.new],1) # => exceed depth limit (ArgumentError)
|Marshal.dump([C.new],2)
|
|bash-2.04$ ruby -v dump_depth.rb
|ruby 1.6.1 (2000-09-27) [i686-cygwin]
|depth = 0
|
|Questions:
|
|1. Why does dump(Array, limit) subtract 2 from the limit/depth?
|     My guess was that it would subtract one since the object in the array
|     is a sub-object to the array "one step down".

Because you're dumping array (level 1) contains an instance of C
(level 2).  So you need to specify level greater than 2.

|2. If I write my own _dump functions should I subtract one or two from the
|limit when passing it on to sub-objects?

You have to subtract 1, not 2.

							matz.

In This Thread