[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>
From: Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com>
Thanks.
From: Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com>
Ah, thanks, I think I get it, a slightly different nuance then.
From: Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com>
'Because all of Ruby has been...' -> 'Because Ruby has been...'?
[#5221] better way to say 'recursive join' — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>
in [ruby-dev:6289], Shugo Maeda suggested better name for recursive
[#5240] Ruby for Win32/DOS — Dennis Newbold <dennisn@...>
Not all of us are blessed with the opportunity to be able to develop on
[#5254] problem: undefined method `size' for File — "葡ic Santonacci" <Eric.Santonacci@...>
Hi all,
HI,
[#5264] Re: problem: undefined method `size' for Fil e — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
matz critizes good solution argumenting with features lacking from some
[#5268] Proper ConditionVariable usage? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Abstract
On Wed, 04 Oct 2000 07:05:22 +0900, Aleksi Niemelwrote:
In message <20001004110040.A26666@xs4all.nl>
Hi,
[#5276] Re: Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — schneik@...
[#5294] Re: RFC: Enumerable#every(n) — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Hastily posting something isn't good thing to do. I started to wonder if I
[#5310] Errata for Ruby Book? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>
[#5318] Redefining super method as singleton? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#5329] Ruby vs PHP ? — "Valerio Bamberga" <bamberga@...>
Hi!
[#5331] Unit testing network code? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Can someone give me pointers on how to Unit Test code that is run on
> I think maybe one would test each end on its own first, faking the
[#5335] string streams in Ruby? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Is there any way, without going through "modifying the internals",
[#5346] Is Ruby "enough better"? — Gabriel Lima <Gabriel.Lima@...>
Hi.
[#5364] Allowing *ary's in the middle of a camma separated list — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hi,
Hi,
At Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:17:24 +0900,
[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
OK, here is what I think I know.
At Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:37:25 +0900,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>
At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,
Thanks for the input.
At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,
At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 07:25:03 +0900,
oops, I didn't read this one before I went out for food..
At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:59:19 +0900,
[#5437] Editor recommandations? — "Chris Morris" <chrismo@...>
Any recommendations on editors for Ruby script on Windows?
[#5471] 2 ideas from Haskell — Mark Slagell <ms@...>
Do either of these interest anyone:
[#5479] Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...>
I am reading the documentation I found about ruby but several points
[#5480] InstallShield version for Ruby soon... — andy@... (Andrew Hunt)
Okay folks,
[#5489] Regexp#matches — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Would someone object aliasing matches for match in Regexp?
[#5505] Sorry, What is Ruby Book — Mansuriatus Shahrir Amir <chioque@...>
Sorry if this information is somewhere obvious. I just stumbled upon
[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>
>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:
Hi,
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:
Hi,
> Proposal a and b have incompatibility. I'm not sure it's worth it.
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@zetabits.com> writes:
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@zetabits.com> writes:
[#5558] GC: malloc_memories — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
Hi,
> |precipitate a new GC cycle if lots of resizing is done. My biggest
[#5570] Notes about GC — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
[#5600] passing single or multiple strings. — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
With multple assignments I can get nested arrays "shelled" (like peas)
In message "[ruby-talk:5600] passing single or multiple strings."
[#5603] debug command list in English — "Morris, Chris" <ChrisM@...>
I found this page which lists the interactive debugger commands ... anyone
[#5619] lint? — "Swit" <swit@...>
Is there something like lint for Ruby? I'd like to find NameErrors before
[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Charles Hixson wrote:
[#5715] Help: sockets broken — jason petrone <jp@...>
I just compiled ruby 1.6.1 on an openbsd 2.6 machine(x86).
[#5716] Re: Array#insert — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> From: jweirich@one.net [mailto:jweirich@one.net]
[#5727] String#slice surprise — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...>
Hi,
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#5787] Shells and Ruby — "Dat Nguyen" <thucdat@...>
Hello all,
[#5850] Re: Array#insert rehashed — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Dave asks for:
[#5862] succ but no pred? (& the MURKY award) — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
First of all, a serious question:
[#5873] Integer(String) weirdness for a ruby newbie — Stoned Elipot <Stoned.Elipot@...>
Hi,
[#5881] Q:what about "Programming Ruby"? — Gabriel Lima <Gabriel.Lima@...>
Hi to you all.
[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>
Hello fellow rubyists,
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, hipster wrote:
[#5947] Hash.new {block} / Hash#default_proc{,_set} — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>
I've done very little testing, but I think I've successfully implemented the
[#5959] Problem with ++? — shreeve@...2s.org (Steve Shreeve)
Here's a simple script that seems to work fine:
[ruby-talk:5597] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.)
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, ts wrote: > >>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes: > > D> I propose to back up to the solution proposed in [ruby-talk:5543], i.e. > D> treat all the parameters as fresh variables. > > Just wait some times (2 or 3 years) and if nobody use the syntax |a, b| > deprecate it. no ? Yes I think this also is a nice solution. In this case, however, one has to choose a syntax that does not allow mixing of "new semantics parameters" with "old semantics parameters" and one should advertise about the new syntax to avoid lazy usage of old construct. I view sadly the fact of having a nice brand new language in which there are constructs that are not (from a "purist" perspective) the best thing one could have. Bye Davide