[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5389] Re: applying unit testing to ruby?

From: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>
Date: 2000-10-10 16:11:27 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5389
Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:
> Mathieu Bouchard <matju@cam.org> writes:
> 
> > It would be nice to have a number of unit tests for Ruby internals
> > themselves, so that if I break something hacking with the internals I may
> > know it. Of course this isn't ideal because Ruby unit tests have to rely
> > on Ruby somehow, to be evaluated; but it could be good for catching subtle
> > changes in less fundamental modules/classes, e.g. IO, File, Regex. 
> 
> Funny you should say that...
> 
> I'm in the middle of completing a set for Ruby 1.6. Right now I have
> tests for 796 separate functions, with just over 10,000 asserts.
> 
> My problem is that it currently is not multi-platform. It runs on
> recent Linux versions, but it relies on having some utilities present
> that older Linuxes (and other Unices don't have). When I get time I'll 
> tidy it up and make it available for download.

Cool :)  Let me know if you want any help getting rid of Linux dependencies 
-- I'd love to have the regression test suite, too.

--
 Brian Fundakowski Feldman           \  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!  /
 green@FreeBSD.org                    `------------------------------'



In This Thread

Prev Next