[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>
From: Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com>
Thanks.
From: Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com>
Ah, thanks, I think I get it, a slightly different nuance then.
From: Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com>
'Because all of Ruby has been...' -> 'Because Ruby has been...'?
[#5221] better way to say 'recursive join' — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>
in [ruby-dev:6289], Shugo Maeda suggested better name for recursive
[#5240] Ruby for Win32/DOS — Dennis Newbold <dennisn@...>
Not all of us are blessed with the opportunity to be able to develop on
[#5254] problem: undefined method `size' for File — "葡ic Santonacci" <Eric.Santonacci@...>
Hi all,
HI,
[#5264] Re: problem: undefined method `size' for Fil e — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
matz critizes good solution argumenting with features lacking from some
[#5268] Proper ConditionVariable usage? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Abstract
On Wed, 04 Oct 2000 07:05:22 +0900, Aleksi Niemelwrote:
In message <20001004110040.A26666@xs4all.nl>
Hi,
[#5276] Re: Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — schneik@...
[#5294] Re: RFC: Enumerable#every(n) — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Hastily posting something isn't good thing to do. I started to wonder if I
[#5310] Errata for Ruby Book? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>
[#5318] Redefining super method as singleton? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#5329] Ruby vs PHP ? — "Valerio Bamberga" <bamberga@...>
Hi!
[#5331] Unit testing network code? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Can someone give me pointers on how to Unit Test code that is run on
> I think maybe one would test each end on its own first, faking the
[#5335] string streams in Ruby? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Is there any way, without going through "modifying the internals",
[#5346] Is Ruby "enough better"? — Gabriel Lima <Gabriel.Lima@...>
Hi.
[#5364] Allowing *ary's in the middle of a camma separated list — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Hi,
Hi,
At Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:17:24 +0900,
[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
OK, here is what I think I know.
At Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:37:25 +0900,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>
At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,
Thanks for the input.
At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,
At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 07:25:03 +0900,
oops, I didn't read this one before I went out for food..
At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:59:19 +0900,
[#5437] Editor recommandations? — "Chris Morris" <chrismo@...>
Any recommendations on editors for Ruby script on Windows?
[#5471] 2 ideas from Haskell — Mark Slagell <ms@...>
Do either of these interest anyone:
[#5479] Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...>
I am reading the documentation I found about ruby but several points
[#5480] InstallShield version for Ruby soon... — andy@... (Andrew Hunt)
Okay folks,
[#5489] Regexp#matches — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Would someone object aliasing matches for match in Regexp?
[#5505] Sorry, What is Ruby Book — Mansuriatus Shahrir Amir <chioque@...>
Sorry if this information is somewhere obvious. I just stumbled upon
[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>
>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:
Hi,
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:
Hi,
> Proposal a and b have incompatibility. I'm not sure it's worth it.
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@zetabits.com> writes:
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@zetabits.com> writes:
[#5558] GC: malloc_memories — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
Hi,
> |precipitate a new GC cycle if lots of resizing is done. My biggest
[#5570] Notes about GC — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
[#5600] passing single or multiple strings. — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
With multple assignments I can get nested arrays "shelled" (like peas)
In message "[ruby-talk:5600] passing single or multiple strings."
[#5603] debug command list in English — "Morris, Chris" <ChrisM@...>
I found this page which lists the interactive debugger commands ... anyone
[#5619] lint? — "Swit" <swit@...>
Is there something like lint for Ruby? I'd like to find NameErrors before
[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Charles Hixson wrote:
[#5715] Help: sockets broken — jason petrone <jp@...>
I just compiled ruby 1.6.1 on an openbsd 2.6 machine(x86).
[#5716] Re: Array#insert — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
> From: jweirich@one.net [mailto:jweirich@one.net]
[#5727] String#slice surprise — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...>
Hi,
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#5787] Shells and Ruby — "Dat Nguyen" <thucdat@...>
Hello all,
[#5850] Re: Array#insert rehashed — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Dave asks for:
[#5862] succ but no pred? (& the MURKY award) — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>
First of all, a serious question:
[#5873] Integer(String) weirdness for a ruby newbie — Stoned Elipot <Stoned.Elipot@...>
Hi,
[#5881] Q:what about "Programming Ruby"? — Gabriel Lima <Gabriel.Lima@...>
Hi to you all.
[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>
Hello fellow rubyists,
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, hipster wrote:
[#5947] Hash.new {block} / Hash#default_proc{,_set} — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...>
I've done very little testing, but I think I've successfully implemented the
[#5959] Problem with ++? — shreeve@...2s.org (Steve Shreeve)
Here's a simple script that seems to work fine:
[ruby-talk:5629] Re: Problem with pack on 64-bit machines
Hi, Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be working yet. It looks like the "sizeof" in two of the macros are an oversight, and further down OFF16B and OFF32B were getting redefined on a NATINT_PACK but not WORDS_BIGENDIAN machine. Here's my shot at fixing it: --- pack.c~ Tue Oct 17 00:28:22 2000 +++ pack.c Tue Oct 17 00:36:28 2000 @@ -24,12 +24,15 @@ #ifdef NATINT_PACK # define OFF16B(p) ((char*)(p) + (natint?0:(sizeof(short) - SIZE16))) # define OFF32B(p) ((char*)(p) + (natint?0:(sizeof(long) - SIZE32))) -# define NATINT_I32(x) (natint?sizeof(NUM2LONG(x)):(NUM2I32(x))) -# define NATINT_U32(x) (natint?sizeof(NUM2ULONG(x)):(NUM2U32(x))) +# define NATINT_I32(x) (natint?(NUM2LONG(x)):(NUM2I32(x))) +# define NATINT_U32(x) (natint?(NUM2ULONG(x)):(NUM2U32(x))) # define NATINT_LEN(type,len) (natint?sizeof(type):(len)) # ifdef WORDS_BIGENDIAN # define OFF16(p) OFF16B(p) # define OFF32(p) OFF32B(p) +# else +# define OFF16(p) (char*)(p) +# define OFF32(p) (char*)(p) # endif #else # define NATINT_I32(x) NUM2I32(x) At least "make test" now doesn't fail, and the tests I did with pack and unpack of "N" and "n" and a few others all seemed to be working. Thanks, Wes. ## Wes Nakamura - wknaka@pobox.com On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: : Hi, : : In message "[ruby-talk:5554] Problem with pack on 64-bit machines" : on 00/10/16, Wes Nakamura <wknaka@pobox.com> writes: : : |I think I've found a problem with ruby 1.6.1 (non-cvs) Array#pack when : |on a 64-bit machine (in this case, an alpha running linux, so it's : |64-bit little-endian). : | : |e.g.: : | : |>> [1].pack "N" : |=> "\000\000\000\000" : |>> [0x0102030405060708].pack "N" : |=> "\001\002\003\004" : |>> [0x0000000001020304].pack "N" : |=> "\000\000\000\000" : : Thank you. I found two bugs. : : * offset shoule be applied for network byteorder, even on little : endien machines. : : * integer size should be checked even for unsigned integers. : : I think I fixed this. Try the latest CVS, or soon releasing 1.6.2. : Thank you again. : : matz. : p.s. : I also appreciate the staffs in the Unversity of Tokyo, who supplied me : an account to Alpha Linux machine. : : :