[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5386] Re: Allowing *ary's in the middle of a camma separated list

From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Date: 2000-10-10 15:28:17 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5386
At Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:38:58 +0900,
Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> wrote:
> I think we should change only multiple right hand side (or mrhs in parse.y),
> and leave left hand side (lhs) like it is nowadays.

Yes, that's exactly what I suggested in my original mail:

At Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:17:24 +0900,
I wrote:
> Now, can Ruby's grammar be changed to accept *ary's in the middle of a
> camma separated list where it's not a part of L-value?
                       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> P.S.
> I also think it's nice to accept it even in an L-value like this:
> 
>   rev = "1.1.2.2"
>   *first, last = rev.split '.'
> 
> but I wouldn't insist that, as it must increase the complexity much.

For the moment I'm sort of pessimistic about this.

  *a, b, *c, d = [1,2,3,4,5] # a = [1,2,3], b = 4, c = [], d = 5

Feh, I'm getting sick. 8)

-- 
                           /
                          /__  __       
                         / )  )  ) )  /
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ /  ( (__(  @ idaemons.org / FreeBSD.org

"We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly"

In This Thread

Prev Next