[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5511] Re: 2 ideas from Haskell

From: hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>
Date: 2000-10-13 14:55:21 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5511
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000  23:12:44 +0900, Hal E. Fulton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 1. a "literate mode" that assumes all lines in a script are comments
> > > > unless the first column is a special character (Haskell uses '>').
> > > >
[snip]
> 
> I can see where this might be of some value... but I *think* I might like
> some
> other way of distinguishing besides the file extension. Maybe a command line
> parameter? Or maybe something embedded at the top of the file? For scripts
> using #!, of course, they become almost the same.

quick hack, call this script something like `lruby':

------

#!/usr/bin/ruby -w

MARK = ">"

script = File.open(ARGV.shift).readlines
script.each{ |line|
  if line !~ /^#{MARK}/
    line.sub!(/^/, "# ")      # comment out documentation
  else
    line.sub!(/^#{MARK}/, "") # unmark code
  end
}

eval script.to_s              # run it

------

$ cat x
doc doc doc

> class Foo
>   def initialize
>     puts "foo!"
>   end
> end

doc doc doc

> Foo.new

doc doc doc

$ lruby x
foo!
$ _


	hope to help,
	Michel

In This Thread