[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5536] Re: 2 ideas from Haskell

From: Jon Babcock <jon@...>
Date: 2000-10-14 15:59:33 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5536
>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:

    > We actually wrote about the dangers of over-commenting in
    > Pragmatic Programmer. In fact, in a past life I used to be a
    > person who wrote moe comments than code. I had beautifully
    > formated comment blocks everywhere, and emacs marcos that let me
    > edit them. Then one day I realized that whenever I changed a
    > program, I was spending more time maintaining the comments than
    > the code, and the only time I ever read the comments was when I
    > was changing them. So I tried cutting back, and I've found that
    > I don't miss them at all.

But I wonder how you would evaluate the _pedagogic_ value that writing
those comments has had for you?

(My son, Michael, has been writing a new, Linux-based, control system
for puppets at Henson's Creature Shop in L.A. for a couple years, all
in C++, and when I asked him about comments, his response was close to
what Dave has said; he uses them very sparsely and with the same
rationale. But he admitted, albeit reluctantly, that writing comments
while at university helped him learn to C++, C, etc.)


Jon

-- 
Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com>

In This Thread

Prev Next