From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Date: 2000-10-26T15:12:36+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:5868] Re: succ but no pred? (& the MURKY award) Hi, In message "[ruby-talk:5862] succ but no pred? (& the MURKY award)" on 00/10/26, "Hal E. Fulton" writes: |Is there some special reason that Ruby has (here and there) |a successor function (succ) but never a predecessor function |(pred)? Two reasons: * Perl does not have magic decrement * I was (and still is) too tired to define what should be the exact behavior of magic decrement myself. matz.