[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5406] Re: Object.foo, setters and so on

From: Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>
Date: 2000-10-11 03:07:35 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5406
At Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:37:25 +0900,
Hal E. Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> wrote:
> 
> OK, here is what I think I know.
> 
> These three fragements differ only in that the last one defines a
> private method, no?

nop

> class Object
>   def foo
>     ...
>   end
> end

you defined public method 'foo' in class Object

you call it:
Object.new.foo

> def foo
>   ...
> end

you defined private method 'foo' in class Object

you call it
foo # no receiver.

> def Object.foo
>   ...
> end

you defined singleton method for class Object

you call it
Object.foo

> And isn't it true that a method like bar= must be called with a receiver?

nop.

> Then why won't this work?

so that's just the way it is.

> def bar=
>   ...
> end
> 
> self.bar = 5

however, i don't know why the following doesn't work :(

def bar=(value)
  p value
end

bar = 5

> It tells me that bar is private. Why? 

because you defined private method :) this thing came up on -talk a
few days ago, no?

> [2  <text/html; iso-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>]

and you can keep your the html file.

hope it helps
--
            yashi


In This Thread