[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5461] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ?

From: "Dat Nguyen" <thucdat@...>
Date: 2000-10-12 15:14:32 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5461


>From: Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com>
>Reply-To: ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp
>To: ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp (ruby-talk ML)
>Subject: [ruby-talk:5433] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ?
>Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 07:25:03 +0900
>
>
>Help greatly appreciated. So unless I hear screaming and hollering,
>I'm using:
>
>If, due to the nature of C, there is no need for func2, then
>there is also no need to fetch the 2nd and 3rd arguments.
>
>For J. original:
>
>C言語の性質から使う必要がなければ第2、第3引数を受け取る必要はありません。
>
>And thanks for the J. rewrite, Sugihara-san, that confirmed my quess.
>
>(Ch9 will be out of my hands soon within an hour. Ch5 is next.)
>
>Jon
>
>
>
>--
>Jon Babcock <jon@kanji.com>
>

Do you consult "The Elements of Style" by White and Strunk?
Can it be shorter like:

Due to the nature of C, if there is no use for func2, it's not necessary
to fetch the 2nd and 3rd arguments.

Dat
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.


In This Thread

Prev Next