[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5822] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.)

From: "John Small" <jsmall@...>
Date: 2000-10-24 16:18:50 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5822
I don't know enough yet about the Ruby internals to understand
how NODE_LVAR and NODE_DVAR are implemented/interpretted.

What I was thinking of was that the break would propagate back through
the yield statement as a break in it's context and only loop the yield is
enclosed in.

John

----- Original Message -----
From: "ts" <decoux@moulon.inra.fr>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp>
Cc: <ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 11:13 AM
Subject: [ruby-talk:5821] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters,
etc.)


> >>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@zetabits.com> writes:
>
>  How do you do this ?
>
> Y>   [1,2,3].each{|i6| break if i6 % 2 == 0}
>                                 ^^
>  here you have a node NODE_DVAR
>
> Y> will be a plain local variable.
>
>  This mean that you must re-read the whole def to modify all the NODE_DVAR
>  in a NODE_LVAR, no ?
>
>
>  I've forgotten to reply to this, sorry
>
> Y> Are you (and others) going to attend Linux Expo Paris?
>
>  Unfortunately it's not possible for me.
>
>
> Guy Decoux
>
>
>
>
>


In This Thread