[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5842] Re: Symbolic evaluation without quoting trick.

From: "Conrad Schneiker/Austin/Contr/IBM" <schneik@...>
Date: 2000-10-25 06:53:09 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5842
matju wrote:

# > I thought some people here might find the following trick useful,
# > possibly for other sorts of applications.
# >   Re: ANNOUNCE: PySymbolic - Doing Symbolics in Python
# 
# I think there was a 10-line Perl example for that. Maybe in Conway's 
book.

Found it.

It's actually an interesting 1+ page long example of a Roman numerals 
class (in chapter 10 on operator overloading).

(It's another reminder not to make the common mistake of confusing the 
incredible clunkiness of Perl's OO with the considerable power of Perl's 
OO.)

# > > Definitely.  Once again, Python's simplicity, dynamicity, 
regularity,
# > > combine to make the seemingly-impossible into the 
actually-pretty-easy.
# > > What a language...!
# > Well, likewise for Ruby.
# 
# Oh yea? Show me the code :-)

CGACCAAGTCTTATCGCAGTGGAATTGCGCAAGACTCCATTACGTAAGGTCAGGTAGACTCTTGTGACACTGCCATATTTCTTTCGGTAGCACTTTTACCTCCATATAGGTACCACGTGTACTTCGGAGAATATTTTCGACCTCGCATGGGTACTCGCTTGCGGCATCATATCGGTCAGGTTATACAAACCAGCTGGCCGCACCCTACGTCACTGAGCAGCACTCTAGCGAGAAGAGATATGCATTCACGGGAGTACCCTAAGGCACGTTATTTTGGAGGTAAGGGGAGTTCAAGAGAGGGGGGCATAAGACGTGTGTTGGGGCGGAAAATACCTGTCAAGTGTAGAGGATGGCCATTCGATCCTGTTCCAGTCGATAGCGAATTTTCTGCGACTATTTTAAATTCACCGACACCATTGCGACCAGCGCAAGGTACACCACTGCCAACGACTATATGTCGGACCAAATTTTGCAAAATATCTTGAACTTGGAACGGGTAGTATATGGCGCACCTAACGCGGTCCCTGCGTATATCCACATGTCTACGGGCCCTAGATCCGTGAATCAAGCATGTACACCTCAAACGGGAATCTGAGTGGTTCTTGCTTTTTGATGGGCAGAGCCCTATGCGCCGTGATTTATTCTTCTGTAATGCTACATATTGAGCTCTGGATATAAGGGTTCCTTTATTAGGGAAACAAGTGCCGGCGTAGTTTGAAGCGTCTTGTTCGAGTCTTTGGCCACCCCATATGTGTGTCGTAGGTCTCTCGCCTGAGTGCAACCACTCCACTTATTCCCTCTACACATAGAATGTCGATGTCCGTGGTTGTATTCTTCAATTTAGGTATAAGCCTGTTCGAATTCGGTTAAGCCGCTGCCATTACTGATGTGACCTTCCTGTGGGGTCTATGATATTCACTTATTATACGATATTAGGGATTTGGTCTGCTTACATCCTGATAAAGCGGGCACGGCGGCCGATAGGGGTCCA!
!
TTCAGAGCG

Finding the key is left as an exercise for the reader. :-)

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)

In This Thread

Prev Next