[#5218] Ruby Book Eng tl, ch1 question — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

13 messages 2000/10/02

[#5404] Object.foo, setters and so on — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

OK, here is what I think I know.

14 messages 2000/10/11

[#5425] Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...>

18 messages 2000/10/11
[#5427] RE: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — OZAWA -Crouton- Sakuro <crouton@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 03:49:46 +0900,

[#5429] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Jon Babcock <jon@...> 2000/10/11

Thanks for the input.

[#5432] Re: Ruby Book Eng. tl, 9.8.11 -- seishitsu ? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/10/11

At Thu, 12 Oct 2000 04:53:41 +0900,

[#5516] Re: Some newbye question — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == Davide Marchignoli <marchign@di.unipi.it> writes:

80 messages 2000/10/13
[#5531] Re: Some newbye question — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/10/14

Hi,

[#5544] Re: Some newbye question — Davide Marchignoli <marchign@...> 2000/10/15

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#5576] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/10/16

matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#5617] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.) — "Brian F. Feldman" <green@...> 2000/10/16

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> wrote:

[#5705] Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

There has been discussion on this list/group from time to time about

16 messages 2000/10/20
[#5712] Re: Dynamic languages, SWOT ? — Charles Hixson <charleshixsn@...> 2000/10/20

Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:

[#5882] [RFC] Towards a new synchronisation primitive — hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>

Hello fellow rubyists,

21 messages 2000/10/26

[ruby-talk:5647] Re: local variables (nested, in-block, parameters, etc.)

From: "Conrad Schneiker/Austin/Contr/IBM" <schneik@...>
Date: 2000-10-17 18:21:29 UTC
List: ruby-talk #5647
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
...
>  Clemens Hintze  writes:
> 
> |Sorry matz, but could you show me a simple example where such a 
construct is
> |necessary? I use Ruby now for several years, but I am sure I never had 
to
> |use that feature until today. I know it exists, but I really cannot 
remember
> |that I need it ... perhaps I have a wrong imagination, so I would like 
to
> |ask you for an example ...
> 
> Here's the simplest example:
> 
>   i = nil
>   ary.each{|i| break if condition(i)}
>   p i

OK, how about this for near laziness:

# cat block.rb
x = "Whatever will be will be, the future's a tautology, .... :-)"
(1..10).each{|i| (x = i; break) if (i == 4)}
p x 

# ruby block.rb
4

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)

In This Thread

Prev Next