[#136217] Getting Ruby approved — Joe Van Dyk <joevandyk@...>

Hi,

49 messages 2005/04/01

[#136254] emerald 0.1 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hello,

22 messages 2005/04/01

[#136329] Kernel.load() behaviour — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

I want to wrap a pile of classes, which are defined in their own files, inside

20 messages 2005/04/01
[#136334] Re: Kernel.load() behaviour — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2005/04/01

[#136357] Re: Kernel.load() behaviour — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...> 2005/04/01

On Friday 01 April 2005 17:24, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#136362] Re: Kernel.load() behaviour — Aredridel <aredridel@...> 2005/04/01

>

[#136390] Re: Kernel.load() behaviour — Brian Mitchell <binary42@...> 2005/04/01

On Apr 1, 2005 11:48 AM, Aredridel <aredridel@gmail.com> wrote:

[#136370] what password obfuscation options are there in standard ruby on windows? — rpardee@...

Hey All,

13 messages 2005/04/01

[#136445] MySQL under latest one-click installer — "R. Mark Volkmann" <mark@...>

Can it really be this hard to access MySQL from Ruby running under Windows?

13 messages 2005/04/02

[#136470] Handling Timeout::Error from TCPSocket — Pat Maddox <pergesu@...>

I'm writing a little method that just tries to open a tcp socket

19 messages 2005/04/02
[#136513] Re: Handling Timeout::Error from TCPSocket — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/04/02

Quoting pergesu@gmail.com, on Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 08:05:15PM +0900:

[#136520] Re: Handling Timeout::Error from TCPSocket — Pat Maddox <pergesu@...> 2005/04/02

I don't want to override the protocol's idea of a timeout - I'd like

[#136529] Re: Handling Timeout::Error from TCPSocket — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/04/02

Quoting pergesu@gmail.com, on Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 02:03:51AM +0900:

[#136536] Re: Handling Timeout::Error from TCPSocket — Pat Maddox <pergesu@...> 2005/04/02

In Java:

[#136551] Re: Handling Timeout::Error from TCPSocket — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/04/02

Quoting pergesu@gmail.com, on Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 03:33:47AM +0900:

[#136555] Re: Handling Timeout::Error from TCPSocket — Pat Maddox <pergesu@...> 2005/04/02

All I'm trying to do is see if a connection can be made or not, in a

[#136568] Re: Handling Timeout::Error from TCPSocket — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/04/02

Quoting pergesu@gmail.com, on Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 05:19:36AM +0900:

[#136499] Best way to get latest ruby on OS X? — Dennis Roberts <denrober@...>

So I just got a mac mini and want to get the latest version of ruby.

18 messages 2005/04/02

[#136630] - E04 - jamPersist Evaluation Case Applied to Ruby — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

[EVALUATION] - E03 - jamLang Evaluation Case Applied to Ruby

21 messages 2005/04/03
[#137221] Re: [EVALUATION] - E04 - jamPersist Evaluation Case Applied to Ruby — Kirk Haines <khaines@...> 2005/04/07

Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#136633] Rant 0.3.2 — Stefan Lang <langstefan@...>

Rant is a flexible build tool written entirely in Ruby,

29 messages 2005/04/03
[#136636] Re: [ANN] Rant 0.3.2 — Jamis Buck <jamis@37signals.com> 2005/04/03

On Apr 3, 2005, at 10:40 AM, Stefan Lang wrote:

[#136652] Re: [ANN] Rant 0.3.2 — Stefan Lang <langstefan@...> 2005/04/03

On Sunday 03 April 2005 19:23, Jamis Buck wrote:

[#136661] Re: [ANN] Rant 0.3.2 — Lionel Thiry <lthiryidontwantspam@...> 2005/04/03

Stefan Lang a 馗rit :

[#136662] Re: [ANN] Rant 0.3.2 — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-talk@...> 2005/04/03

Lionel Thiry, April 4:

[#136679] Re: [ANN] Rant 0.3.2 — Lionel Thiry <lthiryidontwantspam@...> 2005/04/04

Nikolai Weibull a 馗rit :

[#136682] Re: [ANN] Rant 0.3.2 — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2005/04/04

On Sunday 03 April 2005 09:49 pm, Lionel Thiry wrote:

[#137006] Re: [ANN] Rant 0.3.2 — Lionel Thiry <lthiryidontwantspam@...> 2005/04/05

Jim Weirich a 馗rit :

[#136666] Ruby optimization - re-implement in compiled language? — Ant Sims <antsims9999@...>

11 messages 2005/04/03

[#136685] Ruby rite (Ruby 2.0) vaporware or real? — Stephen Birch <sgbirch@...>

Matz's keynote topic at Rubyconf in which Ruby 2.0 was introduced was

13 messages 2005/04/04

[#136701] Nitro + Og 0.15.0, Localization, Parametrized mixins, Morphing, SQLServer — "George Moschovitis" <george.moschovitis@...>

Hello everyone,

12 messages 2005/04/04

[#136740] Extension question — Joe Van Dyk <joevandyk@...>

Hi,

25 messages 2005/04/04

[#136774] fed up with this newsgroup — "Seppuku" <fscker2000@...>

I am sorry, but are you people retards? Why do you feed the Ilias

96 messages 2005/04/04
[#136799] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Glenn Parker <glenn.parker@...> 2005/04/04

Seppuku wrote:

[#136877] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — gene.tani@... 2005/04/05

Check this out! his post to c.l.python received 0 replies. That's

[#136885] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Luke Graham <spoooq@...> 2005/04/05

On Apr 5, 2005 4:49 PM, gene.tani@gmail.com <gene.tani@gmail.com> wrote:

[#136889] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — "B. K. Oxley (binkley)" <binkley@...> 2005/04/05

Luke Graham wrote:

[#136908] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — James Britt <james_b@...> 2005/04/05

B. K. Oxley (binkley) wrote:

[#136910] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/04/05

On Apr 5, 2005 10:04 AM, James Britt <james_b@neurogami.com> wrote:

[#137011] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Luke Graham <spoooq@...> 2005/04/06

On Apr 5, 2005 8:18 PM, B. K. Oxley (binkley) <binkley@alumni.rice.edu> wrote:

[#137017] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Bill Guindon <agorilla@...> 2005/04/06

On Apr 5, 2005 9:58 PM, Luke Graham <spoooq@gmail.com> wrote:

[#137019] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Luke Graham <spoooq@...> 2005/04/06

On Apr 6, 2005 12:18 PM, Bill Guindon <agorilla@gmail.com> wrote:

[#137022] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Bill Guindon <agorilla@...> 2005/04/06

On Apr 5, 2005 10:32 PM, Luke Graham <spoooq@gmail.com> wrote:

[#137026] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Luke Graham <spoooq@...> 2005/04/06

On Apr 6, 2005 12:55 PM, Bill Guindon <agorilla@gmail.com> wrote:

[#137029] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Bill Guindon <agorilla@...> 2005/04/06

On Apr 5, 2005 11:28 PM, Luke Graham <spoooq@gmail.com> wrote:

[#137033] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Luke Graham <spoooq@...> 2005/04/06

On Apr 6, 2005 1:47 PM, Bill Guindon <agorilla@gmail.com> wrote:

[#137034] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2005/04/06

Luke Graham wrote:

[#137035] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Gary Lowder <Gary@...> 2005/04/06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#137037] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2005/04/06

Gary Lowder wrote:

[#137072] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/04/06

On Apr 6, 2005, at 12:27 AM, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#137169] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Peter Reilly <peterreilly@...> 2005/04/07

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#137188] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Lyle Johnson <lyle.johnson@...> 2005/04/07

On Apr 7, 2005 3:16 AM, Peter Reilly <peterreilly@apache.org> wrote:

[#137255] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Shajith <demerzel@...> 2005/04/07

Hi!

[#137261] Re: fed up with this newsgroup — Jim Menard <jimm@...> 2005/04/07

Shajith wrote:

[#136776] - need a simple IDE which lists methods and variables — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

I like to try ruby a little bit more.

20 messages 2005/04/04
[#136849] Re: [IDE] - need a simple IDE which lists methods and variables — "Rob ." <rob.02004@...> 2005/04/04

Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#136803] doubly linked list in Ruby? — "ed_davis2" <ed_davis2@...>

I've gone through a Ruby tutorial, and have been writing some

17 messages 2005/04/04

[#136831] Garden RubyNuby Question on parameters in blocks vs. methods — "Trans" <transfire@...>

Noticed a new question on the RubyNuby page of the Garden Wiki.

9 messages 2005/04/04

[#136851] How Ruby is positioned regarding Enterprise Solutions? — Marco Campelo <marco.campelo@...>

Hello All,

21 messages 2005/04/05

[#136898] - E03b - The Ruby Object Model — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

[EVALUATION] - E03 - jamLang Evaluation Case Applied to Ruby

19 messages 2005/04/05

[#136970] Boston Ruby Meetup — "kellan" <kellan@...>

Hi all,

13 messages 2005/04/05
[#136971] looking for Houston meetup — "B. K. Oxley (binkley)" <binkley@...> 2005/04/05

Are they any rubyists in the Houston area interested in getting together?

[#136983] reading/writing Excel formats (or CSV) — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

12 messages 2005/04/05

[#137002] why aren't declarations just syntactic sugar? — Lionel Thiry <lthiryidontwantspam@...>

Hello!

14 messages 2005/04/05

[#137085] Re: Regular expression mismatch ? — "Warren Brown" <warrenb@...>

Han,

13 messages 2005/04/06

[#137144] RMagick question — Joe Van Dyk <joevandyk@...>

Hi,

18 messages 2005/04/07

[#137202] In-depth schema details in ActiveRecord — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...>

A few days ago I posted a question on how to use ActiveRecord to

16 messages 2005/04/07

[#137225] Seven new VMs, all in a row — Peter Suk <peter.kwangjun.suk@...>

Hello everyone,

83 messages 2005/04/07
[#137333] Re: Seven new VMs, all in a row — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2005/04/08

In article <67a2229205040719147fec0f8a@mail.gmail.com>,

[#137335] Re: Seven new VMs, all in a row — Bill Guindon <agorilla@...> 2005/04/08

On Apr 8, 2005 12:19 AM, Phil Tomson <ptkwt@aracnet.com> wrote:

[#137349] Re: Seven new VMs, all in a row — Peter Suk <peter.kwangjun.suk@...> 2005/04/08

[#137360] Re: Seven new VMs, all in a row — "George" <george.marrows@...> 2005/04/08

> I'm not *building* a Ruby VM on top of a Smalltalk VM. The Smalltalk

[#137230] Accessing SVN through Ruby — Bob Aman <vacindak@...>

I want to code up a CMS of sorts in Ruby that uses Subversion as the

29 messages 2005/04/07
[#137555] Re: Accessing SVN through Ruby — "Lee Marlow" <lmarlow@...> 2005/04/09

You might want to take a look at the rscm library on rubyforge: http://rubyforge.org/projects/rscm/

[#137607] Re: Accessing SVN through Ruby — Bob Aman <vacindak@...> 2005/04/09

On Apr 8, 2005 11:35 PM, Lee Marlow <lmarlow@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#137833] Re: Accessing SVN through Ruby — Bob Aman <vacindak@...> 2005/04/11

> On Apr 8, 2005 10:37 PM, Kouhei Sutou <kou@cozmixng.org> wrote:

[#137329] RubyForge at 600 projects and counting... — Richard Kilmer <rich@...>

Tom just activated the 600th project on RubyForge! That and 1,922

11 messages 2005/04/08

[#137370] Re: Seven new VMs, all in a row — flaig@...

Yeah, I'm curious about that too... a couple of years ago I wrote a Python-2-native compiler but was very disappointed to find that it revved up things only 2x to 3x (to less than 1/10 the speed of C code), the matter obviously being that Python's way of object handling already consumed most of the CPU time. Obviously, the need for endless type checks, comparisons and conversions, not to mention memory allocation and deallocation, is a bottleneck, at least in Python -- and though I am not really familiar with the internals of the Ruby interpreter, I think that the problem will be pretty much the same. Also in Smalltalk. So there must really be some fundamental stroke of genius involved....

24 messages 2005/04/08
[#137376] Re: Seven new VMs, all in a row — Peter Suk <peter.kwangjun.suk@...> 2005/04/08

On Apr 8, 2005, at 4:41 AM, flaig@sanctacaris.net wrote:

[#137454] Re: Seven new VMs, all in a row — "Charles Mills" <cmills@...> 2005/04/08

[#137462] Re: Seven new VMs, all in a row — Peter Suk <peter.kwangjun.suk@...> 2005/04/08

On Apr 8, 2005, at 12:39 PM, Charles Mills wrote:

[#137490] Re: Seven new VMs, all in a row — Glenn Parker <glenn.parker@...> 2005/04/08

Peter Suk wrote:

[#137507] Re: Seven new VMs, all in a row — Peter Suk <peter.kwangjun.suk@...> 2005/04/08

On Apr 8, 2005, at 3:04 PM, Glenn Parker wrote:

[#137408] Re: [ANN] Instiki 0.10.0 - On The Rails — James Britt <james_b@...>

Alexey Verkhovsky wrote:

20 messages 2005/04/08

[#137459] Gem install fcgi — "Tony Targonski" <Tony.Targonski@...>

Gem installation of fcgi appears to be broken

21 messages 2005/04/08
[#137475] fcgi-0.8.6 recently released — Thursday <nospam@...> 2005/04/08

Tony Targonski wrote:

[#137468] Knight's Travails (#27) — Ruby Quiz <james@...>

The three rules of Ruby Quiz:

16 messages 2005/04/08

[#137558] Array#last_index — jzakiya@...

array.last returns the value of the last array element.

19 messages 2005/04/09

[#137571] method search rule in 2.0? — David Garamond <lists@...6.isreserved.com>

I read:

22 messages 2005/04/09

[#137665] Fico 0.1.0 — Urban Hafner <urban@...>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

25 messages 2005/04/10

[#137671] fxirb 0.2.0 - Multiline Edit (and request for help) — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>

available at http://rubyforge.org/projects/fxirb/

20 messages 2005/04/10

[#137691] Translating A Pattern of Data Into Equation, and ultimately code — Zach Dennis <zdennis@...>

I have the following table of data, and I am looking to create an

20 messages 2005/04/10

[#137700] cmd 0.7.0: Library for Line-Oriented Command Interpreters (initial release) — "Marcel Molina Jr." <marcel@...>

= Cmd 0.7.0 (initial release)

12 messages 2005/04/10

[#137744] [ANN| Bayesian Classification for Ruby — "Lucas Carlson" <lucas@...>

I would like to announce a new module called Classifier for Ruby. It is

15 messages 2005/04/11

[#137759] Re: Seven new VMs, all in a row — flaig@...

I think the "wal-mart argument" is quite an important one. Apart from explicitly creating threads, it would be nice if the Ruby system could be taught to automatically recognize parallelizable code and optimally distribute it across a multiprocessor system -- implicitly. That would be a big advange for high-level programming in general! I do not know the state of the art in this, I only remember that the Atari/Inmos guys failed do do this in Occam, back in the 1980s. Do you think there is a serious chance to get such a thing working?

10 messages 2005/04/11

[#137954] ability to run finalizers at a given point of a program? — Guillaume Cottenceau <gcottenc@...>

Hi,

26 messages 2005/04/12
[#137956] Re: ability to run finalizers at a given point of a program? — ts <decoux@...> 2005/04/12

>>>>> "G" == Guillaume Cottenceau <gcottenc@gmail.com> writes:

[#137965] Re: ability to run finalizers at a given point of a program? — Guillaume Cottenceau <gcottenc@...> 2005/04/12

What version of Ruby are you running? With your example I can see:

[#138080] Really quick question - How do I convert a string to a date — Glenn Smith <glenn.ruby@...>

I need a 'Date' object which is converted from a string value

10 messages 2005/04/13

[#138097] On motivating a Ruby nubie — Sy <sy1235@...>

Hey all. I wanted to dive into a topic that's been on my mind for

26 messages 2005/04/13

[#138107] Needle and Parameterized Services — Rob Lally <ruby@...>

Hi,

14 messages 2005/04/13

[#138130] What's beyond Rails? — "James Toomey" <jamesvtoomey@...>

Somewhat off-topic rant: This isn't so much a dig at Rails but a

37 messages 2005/04/13

[#138288] RedCloth, BlueCloth... — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

...OldCloth, NewCloth? (Sorry, I went to a Dr. Seuss exhibit

22 messages 2005/04/15

[#138299] Is Ruby good for web applications? — "Unknown User" <me@...>

I am a Python and Ruby programmer and I'm thinking about learning PHP,

17 messages 2005/04/15

[#138310] ettiquette question — Chris Pine <glyconis@...>

How do you spell ettiquette? No, no, that's not really my question...

26 messages 2005/04/15

[#138323] Practical considerations for licensing software written with dynamic/non-compiled languages/platforms — Matt Pelletier <pelletierm@...>

Hello all. I'm looking for feedback on the following:

11 messages 2005/04/15

[#138412] Re: Is Ruby good for web applications? — "Tony Targonski" <Tony.Targonski@...>

-----Original Message-----

14 messages 2005/04/15
[#138416] Newbie Ruby and C question — Dave Sims <davsims@...> 2005/04/15

I'm trying to write an interface to the Ruby regular expressions engine

[#138430] - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

[EVALUATION] - E03b - The Ruby Object Model

96 messages 2005/04/16
[#138453] Re: - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — lostboard2001@... 2005/04/16

Let it be noted that c.l.python has absolutely refused to respond to

[#138490] Re: - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/16

lostboard2001@yahoo.com wrote:

[#138556] Re: - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Martin Ankerl <martin.ankerl@...> 2005/04/17

> what has this to do with "false ruby language core documentation"?

[#138615] Re: - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/17

Martin Ankerl wrote:

[#138618] Re: - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-talk@...> 2005/04/18

Ilias Lazaridis, April 18:

[#138622] Re: - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/18

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#138625] Re: - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Lionel Thiry <lthiryidontwantspam@...> 2005/04/18

Ilias Lazaridis a 馗rit :

[#138797] Re: - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/19

Lionel Thiry wrote:

[#138802] Re: - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2005/04/19

On Monday 18 April 2005 11:34 pm, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#138804] Re: - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/19

Jim Weirich wrote:

[#138616] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/17

Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#138678] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/04/18

Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> writes:

[#138791] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/19

Christian Neukirchen wrote:

[#138817] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — mark sparshatt <msparshatt@...> 2005/04/19

Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#138846] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/19

mark sparshatt wrote:

[#138921] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Lionel Thiry <lthiryidontwantspam@...> 2005/04/19

Ilias Lazaridis a 馗rit :

[#138956] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/20

Lionel Thiry wrote:

[#138858] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...> 2005/04/19

Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:

[#138962] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/20

Martin DeMello wrote:

[#138522] Re: All Quiet on the Western Front: Is Rails overshadowing Ruby? — Ryan Leavengood <mrcode1234@...>

Jim Freeze <jim freeze.org> wrote:

32 messages 2005/04/16
[#138525] Re: All Quiet on the Western Front: Is Rails overshadowing Ruby? — James Britt <james_b@...> 2005/04/17

Ryan Leavengood wrote:

[#138547] Re: All Quiet on the Western Front: Is Rails overshadowing Ruby? — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/04/17

James Britt <james_b@neurogami.com> writes:

[#138551] Re: All Quiet on the Western Front: Is Rails overshadowing Ruby? — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...> 2005/04/17

>> Would Rails , for example, have been as successful if people had to

[#138565] Re: All Quiet on the Western Front: Is Rails overshadowing Ruby? — Navindra Umanee <navindra@...> 2005/04/17

David Heinemeier Hansson <david@loudthinking.com> wrote:

[#138570] Re: All Quiet on the Western Front: Is Rails overshadowing Ruby? — Chad Fowler <chadfowler@...> 2005/04/17

On 4/17/05, Navindra Umanee <navindra@cs.mcgill.ca> wrote:

[#138573] Re: All Quiet on the Western Front: Is Rails overshadowing Ruby? — Ryan Leavengood <mrcode@...> 2005/04/17

Chad Fowler wrote:

[#138586] Re: All Quiet on the Western Front: Is Rails overshadowing Ruby? — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2005/04/17

On Sunday 17 April 2005 11:58 am, Ryan Leavengood wrote:

[#138639] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — why the lucky stiff <ruby-talk@...>

I've written a very nuts+bolts article on metaclasses (aka virtual

95 messages 2005/04/18
[#138666] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/04/18

Hi --

[#138684] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — why the lucky stiff <ruby-talk@...> 2005/04/18

David A. Black wrote:

[#138755] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/04/18

Hi --

[#138801] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2005/04/19

[Regarding the term "metaclass"]

[#138845] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/04/19

Hi --

[#138890] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...> 2005/04/19

[#138893] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/04/19

Hi --

[#138907] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — "Jim Weirich" <jim@...> 2005/04/19

[#138946] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/04/20

Hi --

[#138976] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2005/04/20

On Tuesday 19 April 2005 09:29 pm, David A. Black wrote:

[#139035] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — Carlos <angus@...> 2005/04/20

[Jim Weirich <jim@weirichhouse.org>, 2005-04-20 06.15 CEST]

[#139036] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/04/20

Hi --

[#139043] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — Chris Pine <glyconis@...> 2005/04/20

> > One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that the diagram is wrong.

[#139045] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — ts <decoux@...> 2005/04/20

>>>>> "C" == Chris Pine <glyconis@gmail.com> writes:

[#139146] Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly — gabriele renzi <surrender_it@...> 2005/04/21

ts ha scritto:

[#138690] Facets 0.6.3 — Brian Buckley <briankbuckley@...>

Hello,

20 messages 2005/04/18

[#138805] - Tag for Ruby Advocacy Related Topics — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

may I ask the community to introduce a tag, e.g. "[ADVOC]" or "[ADVO]"

28 messages 2005/04/19
[#138852] Re: [ADVOC] - Tag for Ruby Advocacy Related Topics — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/04/19

On 4/19/05, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:

[#138891] Re: Obtaining Hal's "The Ruby Way" in the UK — Nuralanur@...

Dear Glenn,

15 messages 2005/04/19
[#138910] Re: Obtaining Hal's "The Ruby Way" in the UK — Dick Davies <rasputnik@...> 2005/04/19

* Nuralanur@aol.com <Nuralanur@aol.com> [0459 16:59]:

[#138923] Re: Obtaining Hal's "The Ruby Way" in the UK — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2005/04/19

Dick Davies wrote:

[#138925] The Ruby Way: Second Edition (was Re: Obtaining Hal's "The Ruby Way" in the UK) — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/04/19

On Apr 19, 2005, at 6:27 PM, Hal Fulton wrote:

[#138966] : 'Ignoring Lazaridis'-proposal — Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...>

How about everyone stops responding to Lazaridis?

15 messages 2005/04/20

[#138979] - E03d - The Ruby Object Model (End Game) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

[EVALUATION] - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation)

26 messages 2005/04/20
[#139006] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03d - The Ruby Object Model (End Game) — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/04/20

On 4/19/05, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@lazaridis.com> wrote:

[#139010] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03d - The Ruby Object Model (End Game) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/20

Mark Hubbart wrote:

[#139026] Re: Facets 0.6.3 — flaig@...

AFAIK, all kinds of brackets, i.e. (),[] and {} are fine on unixish file systems, as are "+", "-", ",", "." and ";" .

14 messages 2005/04/20
[#139130] Re: Facets 0.6.3 — Michael Campbell <michael.campbell@...> 2005/04/21

It used to be, way back when, that 2 (ascii) chars were disallowed in

[#139052] : Example from Pickaxe2 gives errors... (p. 31) — <Simon.Mullis@...>

Greeting all,

11 messages 2005/04/20

[#139094] Newb CGI Question — Michael Buffington <michael.buffington@...>

So I thought I had CGI in Ruby figured out, but I'm stumped on the following:

11 messages 2005/04/20

[#139166] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

[EVALUATION] - E03d - The Ruby Object Model (End Game)

84 messages 2005/04/21
[#139170] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary) — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/04/21

[Fair warning to those who plan on emailing me regarding this

[#139172] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary) — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/04/21

On Apr 21, 2005, at 7:39 AM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#139174] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/21

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#139178] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary) — Henrik Horneber <ryco@...> 2005/04/21

[#139180] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/21

Henrik Horneber wrote:

[#139199] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/04/21

Hi,

[#139205] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/21

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#139207] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/04/21

[#139210] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/21

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#139216] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/04/21

Hi,

[#139297] Re: [EVALUATION] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/04/22

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#139175] accessor for Class Variable — Leonardo Francalanci <lfrancalanci@...>

I know it's a stupid question, but I can't find the answer...

15 messages 2005/04/21

[#139249] for .. in .. else? — Douglas Livingstone <rampant@...>

In my erb templates, I've got this pattern quite often:

19 messages 2005/04/21
[#139251] Re: for .. in .. else? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/04/21

Hi --

[#139254] Re: for .. in .. else? — "Ryan Leavengood" <mrcode@...> 2005/04/21

David A. Black wrote:

[#139255] Re: for .. in .. else? — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...> 2005/04/21

Ryan Leavengood wrote:

[#139252] Managing complexity and untangling my thoughts — Hal Fulton <hal9000@...>

Sometimes I stare at the monitor and think: Is it too late

18 messages 2005/04/21

[#139276] Proxy Server troubles — Tanner Burson <tanner.burson@...>

I've been working on a proxy server implementation for a project idea

13 messages 2005/04/22

[#139341] HighLine (#29) — Ruby Quiz <james@...>

The three rules of Ruby Quiz:

22 messages 2005/04/22
[#139359] Re: [QUIZ] HighLine (#29) — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2005/04/22

Hi,

[#139365] the Ruby Programming Shop — pat eyler <pat.eyler@...>

Announcing the Ruby Programming Shop (RPS)

11 messages 2005/04/22

[#139390] ruby tk: ruby 1.8.2 bug in TclTkIp with "exit 0" ... ? — Brett Williams <brett_williams@...>

I have a little wrapper around TclTkIp to do tcl interpreting with a

25 messages 2005/04/22
[#139480] Re: ruby tk: ruby 1.8.2 bug in TclTkIp with "exit 0" ... ? — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/04/23

Hello.

[#139749] tk_optionMenu bug in 1.8.2 (WAS: Re: ruby tk: ruby 1.8.2 bug in TclTkIp with "exit 0" ... ? ) — Brett Williams <brett_williams@...> 2005/04/25

H.Yamamoto wrote:

[#139837] Re: tk_optionMenu bug in 1.8.2 — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2005/04/26

Hi,

[#139840] Re: tk_optionMenu bug in 1.8.2 — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/04/26

Hello.

[#139846] Re: tk_optionMenu bug in 1.8.2 — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2005/04/26

Hi,

[#139873] Re: tk_optionMenu bug in 1.8.2 — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2005/04/26

From: Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp>

[#139918] Re: tk_optionMenu bug in 1.8.2 — Brett Williams <brett_williams@...> 2005/04/26

Hidetoshi NAGAI wrote:

[#139994] Re: tk_optionMenu bug in 1.8.2 — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2005/04/27

[#139407] RUBY port to HPUX 64-bit PA-RISC 11.11 — jon.a.miller@...

-Can anyone direct me to a binary distribution of ruby

12 messages 2005/04/22

[#139411] boulder_denver.rb — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...>

you know the drill - this is a call for boulder/denver rubyists to get

16 messages 2005/04/22

[#139412] Re: Ilias is Crazy -- a plea — "Jon A. Lambert" <jlsysinc@...>

Ryan Davis wrote:

30 messages 2005/04/22
[#139414] Re: Ilias is Crazy -- a plea — "Florian Frank" <flori@...> 2005/04/22

Jon A. Lambert wrote:

[#139445] Re: Ilias is Crazy -- a plea — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2005/04/22

On Apr 22, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Florian Frank wrote:

[#139449] Question: Time efficiency of Array << — Peter Suk <peter.kwangjun.suk@...>

Forgive the newbie-ish question. I have been playing around with

20 messages 2005/04/23
[#139451] Re: Question: Time efficiency of Array << — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/04/23

On 22 Apr 2005, at 17:31, Peter Suk wrote:

[#139455] Re: Question: Time efficiency of Array << — Ara.T.Howard@... 2005/04/23

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#139457] Re: Question: Time efficiency of Array << — Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2005/04/23

[#139458] Re: Question: Time efficiency of Array << — Ara.T.Howard@... 2005/04/23

On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Saynatkari wrote:

[#139461] Re: Question: Time efficiency of Array << — William Morgan <wmorgan-ruby-talk@...> 2005/04/23

Excerpts from Ara.T.Howard@noaa.gov's mail of 22 Apr 2005 (EDT):

[#139477] Suggestion: Hash.remove — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

Something I often find useful is a version of Hash.delete which returns the

14 messages 2005/04/23

[#139481] Idea for Ruby Quiz - Su Doku solver — Lyndon Samson <lyndon.samson@...>

How the following look?

12 messages 2005/04/23
[#139489] Re: Idea for Ruby Quiz - Su Doku solver — Douglas Livingstone <rampant@...> 2005/04/23

On 4/23/05, Lyndon Samson <lyndon.samson@gmail.com> wrote:

[#139493] - E04 - Mr. Yukihiro Matsumoto (Ruby's Weakest Point) — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

[EVALUATION] - E03e - The Ruby Object Model (Summary)

28 messages 2005/04/23

[#139518] announcing RubyLexer 0.6.0 — "vikkous" <google@...>

At this time, I am pleased to announce the release of RubyLexer 0.6.0,

25 messages 2005/04/23

[#139540] Dealing with trolls:the age-old debate — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson)

Given a troll's visit to the newsgroup (word on the street is that it's

17 messages 2005/04/23

[#139575] Announcing Reg 0.4.0 — "vikkous" <google@...>

I would like to announce the first version, 0.4.0, of Reg, the Ruby

28 messages 2005/04/24

[#139616] $KCODE reference documentation — dm1 <dmertz@...>

Hello, i know that one can use $KCODE to set the charset encoding, but do

4 messages 2005/04/24
[#140121] Re: $KCODE reference documentation — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2005/04/27

Am Sonntag, 24. Apr 2005, 21:04:31 +0900 schrieb dm1:

[#140159] Re: $KCODE reference documentation — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/04/27

On 4/27/05, Bertram Scharpf <lists@bertram-scharpf.de> wrote:> Am Sonntag, 24. Apr 2005, 21:04:31 +0900 schrieb dm1:> > Hello, i know that one can use $KCODE to set the charset encoding, but do> > not find anymore where this is documented. Any pointers for that ?> > As far as I see when the source code is read the `-K' option> and the inline pragma (`# -*- ...') apply. After that,> `$KCODE' only influences what Regexp's dot (`/./') does.> > But that's just a guess.

[#139663] Folding editor for ruby code browsing — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

I need to fold the code so that I can get a handle on the overall structure;

30 messages 2005/04/24
[#139664] Re: Folding editor for ruby code browsing — Thomas Kirchner <lists@...> 2005/04/24

* On Apr 25 6:46, Andrew Walrond (ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org) wrote:

[#139673] Strange behavior with SimpleDelegator and its Idioclass — "Trans" <transfire@...>

Have a look at this. Run it as is, then unremark the comment section.

16 messages 2005/04/25
[#139686] Re: Strange behavior with SimpleDelegator and its Idioclass — Carlos <angus@...> 2005/04/25

[Trans <transfire@gmail.com>, 2005-04-25 02.04 CEST]

[#139688] Re: Strange behavior with SimpleDelegator and its Idioclass — Carlos <angus@...> 2005/04/25

[Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar>, 2005-04-25 04.06 CEST]

[#139692] Re: Strange behavior with SimpleDelegator and its Idioclass — "Trans" <transfire@...> 2005/04/25

Perhaps I should point out that the strange thing about this is that

[#139775] Arachno Ruby IDE 0.5.5 for Linux — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...>

Arachno Ruby IDE is an integrated development environment for the

27 messages 2005/04/25

[#139860] One-Click Ruby Installer 182-15 for Windows — Curt Hibbs <curt@...>

I had hope to simultaneously release installers

32 messages 2005/04/26

[#139890] ANN: A new scripting language Tao 0.9.0 beta released! — fu.limin.tao@... (Fu Limin)

Dear all,

28 messages 2005/04/26

[#139941] Is Ruby grammar context free? — Peter Suk <peter.kwangjun.suk@...>

Something that came up while discussing Ruby parsing brought this to my

13 messages 2005/04/26

[#140011] vim-ruby broken? — Brian Schrer <ruby.brian@...>

Hello group,

17 messages 2005/04/27
[#140094] Re: vim-ruby broken? — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2005/04/27

Brian Schrer <ruby.brian@gmail.com> [2005-04-27 18:34]:

[#140108] Re: vim-ruby broken? — Joe Van Dyk <joevandyk@...> 2005/04/27

On 4/27/05, Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@code-monkey.de> wrote:

[#140113] Re: vim-ruby broken? — Stefan Lang <langstefan@...> 2005/04/27

On Wednesday 27 April 2005 20:15, Joe Van Dyk wrote:

[#140127] Re: vim-ruby broken? — Brian Schrer <ruby.brian@...> 2005/04/27

On 27/04/05, Stefan Lang <langstefan@gmx.at> wrote:

[#140027] Comments Are More Important Than Code — Tim Hunter <sastph@...>

Even if this is not directly about Ruby, both Jeff Raskin and the

66 messages 2005/04/27
[#140141] Re: Comments Are More Important Than Code — "Dave Fayram" <dfayram@...> 2005/04/27

James Britt said:

[#140146] Re: Comments Are More Important Than Code — James Britt <james_b@...> 2005/04/27

Dave Fayram wrote:

[#140152] Re: Comments Are More Important Than Code — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2005/04/27

* James Britt <james_b@neurogami.com> [2005-04-28 07:33:00 +0900]:

[#140155] Re: Comments Are More Important Than Code — "Dave Fayram" <dfayram@...> 2005/04/27

[#140161] Re: Comments Are More Important Than Code — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2005/04/27

* Dave Fayram <dfayram@gmail.com> [2005-04-28 08:19:29 +0900]:

[#140162] Re: Comments Are More Important Than Code — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2005/04/27

* Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> [2005-04-28 08:42:16 +0900]:

[#140053] Rails Hosting — Andy Stone <xsltguru@...>

Hello all,

13 messages 2005/04/27

[#140216] Ruby and IDE — "the_mindstorm" <the_mindstorm@...>

Hi!

79 messages 2005/04/28
[#140224] Re: Ruby and IDE — "Johan Toki Persson" <tokikenshi@...> 2005/04/28

We're not a craving bunch. Hacking in such a wonderful language is good

[#140227] Re: Ruby and IDE — "Alex the_mindstorm Popescu" <the_mindstorm@...> 2005/04/28

>-----Original Message-----

[#140272] Re: Ruby and IDE — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/04/28

On 4/28/05, Alex the_mindstorm Popescu <the_mindstorm@evolva.ro> wrote:

[#140321] Re: Ruby and IDE — Ben Giddings <bg-rubytalk@...> 2005/04/28

On Thursday 28 April 2005 03:25, the_mindstorm wrote:

[#140332] Re: Emacs vs. VI vs. IDE — Lothar Scholz <mailinglists@...> 2005/04/28

Hello Ben,

[#140355] Re: Emacs vs. VI vs. IDE — Aredridel <aredridel@...> 2005/04/28

> BG> Emacs and vi are astounding at editing text. I doubt there's

[#140359] Re: Emacs vs. VI vs. IDE — kyu <kyu@...> 2005/04/29

Aredridel wrote:

[#140340] ruby static typing — caleb clausen <google@...>

Some time ago, I wrote up some ideas I had for a comprehensive static

14 messages 2005/04/28

[#140378] determining when inside 'class << self' — "Ara.T.Howard" <Ara.T.Howard@...>

26 messages 2005/04/29
[#140578] instantiating metaclasses, sorta [Was: determining when inside 'class << self'] — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/04/30

On 4/28/05, Ara.T.Howard <Ara.T.Howard@noaa.gov> wrote:

[#140425] Barrel of Monkeys (#30) — Ruby Quiz <james@...>

The three rules of Ruby Quiz:

16 messages 2005/04/29

Re: Lalr(n) parsing with reg

From: "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@...>
Date: 2005-04-26 15:21:06 UTC
List: ruby-talk #139887
vikkous wrote:
> Yesterday, I introduced my the Ruby Extended Grammar, a pattern
> matching library for ruby data. Astute readers may have noticed a
> slight misnomer. Reg is not a grammar (parser), nor a tool for
> grammars. It's really just a very fancy regular expression engine.
> Regular expressions are equivalent to state machines. State machines
> are not powerful enough by themselves to solve interesting parsing
> problems -- that is, how to parse a language like ruby with infix
> operators of different precedence and associativity. However, reg can
> be easily augmented to be a real solve interesting parsing problems.
> 
> Handling precedence and associativity requires a lalr(1) parser. Let me
> explain briefly the lalr algorithm:
> 
> The important lalr data structures are the stack and input. The input
> is simply a stream of tokens fed into the parser, as it requests them.
> The next token(s) waiting to be taken off the input is called the
> lookahead.
> The stack contains the results of partially parsed expressions. At each
> step of the parse process, the parser decides (based on what's found at
> the top  of the stack and in the lookahead) whether to shift another
> token off the input onto the stack or to reduce some of the tokens at
> the top of the stack using the rules of the language's grammar. At the
> end, we expect to see the input empty and on the stack a single token,
> which represents the parse tree of the entire program.

> Normal parsers (also called compiler compilers) use a big complicated
> table to decide at runtime whether to shift or reduce and, if reducing,
> which rule to reduce by. This table represents the compiled form of the
> language grammar. That's why they're called compiler compilers. My
> approach is rather different, and might best be described as an
> interpreter interpreter. (Or, if it's to be used in a compiler, it
> would be a compiler interpreter.)
Hm.. I belive it not that different. The tables of an LR(k) parser
specifiy for each input symbol, and each top-of-stack
	a) An action (either shift, or "reduct p" where p is a rule
	( a production) of your grammar
	b) A "goto" - the new state the parser shall transition to.

Your represent the "action" table implicitly - you scan
the rules for every symbol you read, and decide to shift
or to reduce based on that, instead of looking into a predefined
table. Therefore, you just trade compiler-compile time for runtime -
but the mechanism is the same.

The goto table is entirely absent in your approach - but this
stems from the fact that you don't _need_ to remeber a state.
The state of a table-based LR(k) parser is just an "abbreviation"
for the current state of the stack. An table-based LR(k) parser
decided wether to shift or to reduce _soley_ based on the current
input symbol, and the top-of-the-stack. It therefore needs a state,
to "remeber" what it put on the stack previously. Each state
of a LR(k) parser represents a _single_ production (or rule) - but
a rule can be represented by more than one state.

> Instead of shifting or choosing one rule to match at each step, each
> rule is given a chance to match, and when none can, then the input is
> shifted. Reg is used as the pattern matching engine, and a small
> wrapper layer manages the parser data structures and invokes reg at
> each step to do a match
> attempt. I believe this approach is in general equivalent to the normal
> lalr algorithm.
I believe this too.

I believe that you could improve the performance of your parser by
just-in-time compiling of the action and goto tables, or some
舍uivalent thing.

You could, for example, calculate the FOLLOW set (The set of symbols
which can follow a valid right-hand side of a given rule). Then,
you just have to try those rules which have the current top-of-stack
in their FOLLOW set.

This would give a sort of an half-table-based LR(k) parser.

Anyway, thanks for your cool work, and for getting me interested in
parsers again ;-)

greetings, Florian Pflug

--------------ms000601000202000408080504
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s"
Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
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--------------ms000601000202000408080504--

In This Thread

Prev Next