From: gabriele renzi Date: 2005-04-05T06:34:50+09:00 Subject: Re: Getting Ruby approved Phil Tomson ha scritto: >>- the tcl vfs > > > But aren't we moving in that direction now that open can take URLs? sure, but, say, how do we add support for new stuff? I'd like to avoid overriding Kernel::open every time? Possibly just using URI#open, but then, how do I expand it? And what about Dir ? (not great problems, but the more the merrier :) >>- they seem to have a great care on version compatibility/interoperability >>- the ability to trace variable seem very interesting :) > > > Can you elaborate? well, some times ago I stumbled upon http://wiki.tcl.tk/285 and I also noticed that tcl has something built-in akin to rubygems: http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~rhl/Tcl-Tk_docs/tcl8.0a1/package.n.html > None of the items you mentioned are core language features per se (except > maybe the last one). They are more like add-ons. Some of them are > 'cultural'. Certainly we can learn from something like starkit. But as > far as the language I'd rather develop in goes - I definately prefer > developing in Ruby as opposed to Tcl. > > ...but YMMV. oh, no, I definitely agree with you on the whole line :)