From: Phlip <phlip_cpp@...>
Date: 2005-04-02T22:54:54+09:00
Subject: Re: Getting Ruby approved

gga wrote:

> Against Boost Python:
> Ruby has nothing equivalent.  I consider this a good thing.  Boost
> Python is a good idea, but it just pushes the limit of what C++
> compilers can handle with templates and this, imo, currently leads to
> both inefficient and hard to maintain/debug code.

That's why Boost is the leader: Compilers must implement it because it obeys
the Standard that they must get around to.

A Boost Ruby would lend Ruby this credibility (in some eyes).

-- 
  Phlip
  http://industrialxp.org/community/bin/view/Main/TestFirstUserInterfaces