From: Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...>
Date: 2005-04-17T07:07:28+09:00
Subject: Re:

On 4/16/05, Pascal GUICHARD <pascal@guichard.org> wrote:
[snip]
> The fact is that I am a little bit disappointed by the libraries, and the
> evolution : Some things/projects are conducted very well and fast, 
> such as ruby on rails, and I recognize a lot of other ones.

I have no experience with rails. 

Some libs are well maintained, others are not. I am a terrible
maintainer myself.
There has been some talking about making a package system where
each package can be rated by the user. This could ease locating
updated and stabil
packages.

 
> But on the hand, another lot of projects/libraries are present but somewhat
> outdated at best, going even to deprecated/inoperatives such as the
> ruby-python bridge, that IMO
> Should be one of the most well maintained because of all work/llibraries
> that it would make accessible, such the library I mentionned :
> twisted-python, and also a lot of python work.

Sorry.. I have no idea what twisted python is.

 
--
Simon Strandgaard