From: Robert Klemme <bob.news@...>
Date: 2005-04-09T16:14:40+09:00
Subject: [OT] Corega Tabs (was: Re: How should this really be coded in the Ruby style?)


"Bill Kelly" <billk@cts.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag 
news:024b01c53c80$6e3dc6f0$6442a8c0@musicbox...
>> Btw, I think the indentation got garbled because your original had tabs 
>> in
>> it - spaces are much safer.
>
> To be fair, its indentation was intact.  It's just $#@#%#$ Outlook
> Express that's too dain bramaged to display tabs reasonably.
> (If you "Properties -> Message Source" it'll display properly.)

To be fair, OE actually displayed tabs in the original post correctly. :-) 
They got garbled during creation of the reply template.

> [P.S. This post should not be construed as an argument for or against
> tabs. <grin>]

IMHO it's widely known that tabs are treated differently depending on 
platform and tool OE being not the only one with sub optimal handling. 
Using spaces (in mails but also source code) usually saves the hassle of 
formatting surprises.... :-)

Cheers

    robert