From: Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
Date: 2005-04-07T19:54:39+09:00
Subject: Re: [EVALUATION] - E04 - jamPersist Evaluation Case Applied to Ruby

Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> [EVALUATION] - E03 - jamLang Evaluation Case Applied to Ruby
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/msg/412943e7c6ed6968
> 
> The above thread was exceptionally productive.
> 
> http://lazaridis.com/case/lang/ruby.html
> 
> [as it looks, i will take ruby as the "reference" and compare other 
> languages against it]
> 
> -
> 
> The next (more practical) evaluation is persistence:

I am a little disapointed about the feedback in this thread.

> http://lazaridis.com/case/persist/index.html
> 
> there are ready evaluations of another products, thus you can understand 
> the sequence easier, e.g.:
> 
> http://lazaridis.com/case/persist/schevo.html
> 
> you can simply take the above sequence and apply it to the library / 
> product that you suggest for ruby persistency.
> 
> [alternatively, you can just suggest the library/product to use - or 
> provide a pointer to listing]

I am aware about 2 products:

Nitro.Og
http://nitro.rubyforge.org/

Rails.ActiveRecord:
http://ar.rubyonrails.com/

any other solutions for ruby persistency?

..

-- 
http://lazaridis.com