From: Austin Ziegler Date: 2005-04-22T03:16:15+09:00 Subject: Re: Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly On 4/21/05, Ryan Leavengood wrote: > Trans wrote: > > I had been holding on to the term "special class", but I suppose that > > makes it sound like it has "special" needs :-) Perhaps we should try a > > differnt tact, like "root class" or "direct class". > What about "shadow class"? Because it is like it is there, but not really. Star Chamber Class? -austin (scnr) -- Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca