From: Lionel Thiry <lthiryidontwantspam@...>
Date: 2005-04-07T09:01:06+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] Rant 0.3.2

Nikolai Weibull a �crit :
> Lionel Thiry, April 7:
> 
> 
>>SCons main design doc claims its cornerstone is the management of
>>explicit file dependency DAG.
> 
> 
> Where are you reading this?
I've read this one or two years ago, when I interested in SCons. Where? Scons 
organisation has changed much since that time...

Found one:
http://www.scons.org/doc/PDF/scons-design.pdf
This is the design doc of SCons 0.96, the latest version. Look in chapter 3, see 
architecture.

> What it does differently from make(1) is
> that it creates a complete DAG of all dependencies, i.e., it doesn't
> rely on recursive invocations (like make(1) does).  That's the only
> difference I know of,
>         nikolai
> 

Mmm, I fell it hard to tell where is the difference between your statement and mine.

--
Lionel Thiry