From: Mike Woodhouse <mikewoodhouse@...>
Date: 2005-04-18T23:19:41+09:00
Subject: Re: Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly


Karl von Laudermann wrote:
> why the lucky stiff wrote:
> > I've written a very nuts+bolts article on metaclasses (aka virtual
> > classes or metaobjects), since they still lurk under a shroud of
fear
>
> > and enigma.
> >
> >
<http://whytheluckystiff.net/articles/seeingMetaclassesClearly.html>
> >
> > I'm hoping this will help uncover the truth.  If anything is
unclear,
>
> > please report it.  Shed a light.
>
> Noticed a small mistake; At one point, you refer to the at-sign (@)
as
> an ampersand. Other than that... the article went way over my head
and
> twisted my poor brain into knots. :-( I think I'll need to re-read
> chapter 24 of Pickaxe 2 immediately before reading this article.

Glad I'm not the only one who has to go back to the books! (I did spot
the "ampersand" thing, though).