From: Bill Kelly <billk@...>
Date: 2005-04-21T15:49:04+09:00
Subject: Re: [LOON]: 'Ignoring Lazaridis'-proposal

> > Perhaps we can include both in the event he decides he does,
> > in fact, have more leeway in his Ruby Time Budget and posts
> > again.
> 
> I agree that a two pronged approach is probably best. I just worry that 
> ANY response to him will be enough encouragement for him to post more.

Were we lucky this time?  Meaning it seems like because of
kind posters, we have a plethora of info on singleton classes
and metaclasses that resulted from kind folks trying to 
answer questions.

I'm just thinking in terms of focusing on the positive.  :)




Regards,

Bill