From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2005-04-24T21:00:28+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly

Hi --

You wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, gabriele renzi wrote:
> 
> > ah! this is something I always wanted to know, I've been always
> > thinking on the lines of "why
> > are'nt method just defined in the object? do we need this singleton
> > class thing?"
> 
> Because of backwards-compatibility with C++/Java/Perl/Python
> programmers.

Is this something you have real reason stood behind Matz's design
decisions, or is it just an unkind jab at a design you don't happen to
like?


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack@wobblini.net