From: Aredridel <aredridel@...>
Date: 2005-04-09T11:52:09+09:00
Subject: Re: New fcgi gem sorely needed

On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 09:38:57AM +0900, Tobias Luetke wrote:
> Be that as it may, the essence of my post was that we need a new gem. 

Agreed! It's gotta be up-to-date, especially for critical
infrastructure.

> There are hundreds of rails app in production and new ones coming out
> daily while its growth is still exponential. The way people get fcgi
> library right now is by gems. As long as the gem isn't updated all of
> ruby has a memory leak to the average user.

Yup.

> Also 1.0 suggests mature and recommended for consumption, not stable.
> As opposed to 0.8.5 which suggests toy code, please try it out. Fcgi
> is indeed mature and production ready, even in its current memory
> leaking state.

Aye! I put far more care into the label "production ready".

I say < 0.5 sounds toyish; until 1.0, in serious development ... but
then, it varies by project.