From: "Brian Schröder" Date: 2005-04-28T05:52:24+09:00 Subject: Re: vim-ruby broken? On 27/04/05, Stefan Lang wrote: > On Wednesday 27 April 2005 20:15, Joe Van Dyk wrote: > > On 4/27/05, Tilman Sauerbeck wrote: > > > Brian Schr�der [2005-04-27 18:34]: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Following all the discussion on vim here recently, I wanted to try it > > > > out. First thing was checking the vim page on ruby-garden and trying > > > > to install vim-ruby. But here I already am stuck. What I did: > > > > > > The Vim releases already contain syntax/indent files for Ruby, so you > > > probably don't have to install the latest vim-ruby release to enjoy Ruby > > > support in Vim. > > > > > > Cannot help you with the installation failure, I'm using the one that > > > ships with Vim, and copied the syntax file to ~/.vim/syntax to get some > > > minor fixes :) > > > > Doesn't vim-ruby embed a ruby interpreter into vim? So you can run > > small ruby scripts on whatever you're editing? Or am I thinking of > > something else? > > This feature comes with the vim source distribution. You just have to > enable it when you run configure. It also provides a Ruby API for vim. > Type > :h ruby > > Stefan > > Thank you all for your answers. I can imagine that vim is not too bad, after having tried it a bit. But until I find time to find out how to do: 1) Auto-Indent with Tab 2) Execute ruby file in another frame with F5 3) Manage multiple buffers comfortably I will have to stick to xemacs. Though it seems to me that the most common commands are in the standard setting better "huffmann coded" than the emacs variants. best regards, Brian -- http://ruby.brian-schroeder.de/ multilingual _non rails_ ruby based vocabulary trainer: http://www.vocabulaire.org/ | http://www.gloser.org/ | http://www.vokabeln.net/