From: James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Date: 2005-04-19T23:22:56+09:00
Subject: Re: [EVALUATION] - E03c - The Ruby Object Model (Revised Documentation)

On Apr 19, 2005, at 5:14 AM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

> the new diagramm (needs possibly a refresh within your browser):
>
> http://lazaridis.com/case/lang/ruby/
>
> -
>
> please do _not_ focus on the nil issue, but on the existing 
> documentation.

I wish I didn't have to but you have a clearly incorrect arrow and 
label.  This has been adequately proven by plenty of experts on this 
list.  The language designer himself has asked you to remove it.  You 
have become the problem you were complaining about:  You are now 
publishing false documentation.

You claim your "evaluation" is a service to the Ruby community.  
However, making incorrect documentation easily accessible is just the 
opposite.  If someone learning Ruby stumbles upon your site and 
believes what they read there, you have done both the individual and 
the community a great disservice.

You are constantly proving a complete lack of all essential social 
skills and I feel we're going above and beyond the call to ignore this 
and find any possible value for your discussions.  Worse, you display 
the same void of essential programming skills, causing you to obsess 
over minute language details and totally bypass helpful insights into 
the language itself.  This too we have gone to great lengths to 
tolerate.  Unfortunately, you've crossed the line from annoying to 
dangerous.

I must now strongly encourage all people still learning Ruby to avoid 
your information, as the results are likely outright incorrect and you 
are proving yourself incapable of admitting that.

That's my evaluation of your evaluation.

James Edward Gray II