From: Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
Date: 2005-04-08T23:09:47+09:00
Subject: Re: [EVALUATION] - E04 - jamPersist Evaluation Case Applied to Ruby

Kirk Haines wrote:
> Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
> 
>>>Kansas (http://enigo.com/projects/kansas),
>>
>>seems to be in development.
>>
>>status: alpha.
> 
> AR is in development, too.  I should probably update that info, but the fact
> is that Kansas is a lightweight, simple, stable system with fairly few
> "unimplemented features" (my buzzword for bugs ;) used across a veriety of
> production applications, in one version or another, for well over a year
> and currently servicing several million transactions a day.  So, it
> probably should not be listed as alpha, 

yes, you should change this.

> though the version number will stay
> low because it isn't what I want it to be, yet.
> 
> As for "Contains SQL code".  What are you talking about?

I've provide a link:

http://enigo.com/projects/kansas/tutorial/why_use_it.html

I've overflow the document - and have overseen "The ordinary way".

You should possibly focus on the strength of your product, and show 
immediately this compact code:

"
def getData
   result = []
   application.dbpool.getConnection do |ksdbh|
     ksdbh.select('DailyNav').each do |nav|
       result.push nav
     end
   end
   result
end
"

-

would you like to try the evaluation template?

"
http://lazaridis.com/case/persist/index.html

there are ready evaluations of another products, thus you can understand 
the sequence easier, e.g.:

http://lazaridis.com/case/persist/schevo.html
"

..

-- 
http://lazaridis.com