From: Ryan Leavengood <mrcode@...>
Date: 2005-04-22T02:57:34+09:00
Subject: Re: Article: Seeing Metaclasses Clearly

Trans wrote:
>
> I had been holding on to the term "special class", but I suppose that
> makes it sound like it has "special" needs :-) Perhaps we should try a
> differnt tact, like "root class" or "direct class".

What about "shadow class"? Because it is like it is there, but not really.

Ryan Leavengood