From: tsuraan <tsuraan@...>
Date: 2005-04-30T03:32:32+09:00
Subject: Re: Emacs vs. VI vs. IDE

> Perhaps you mean something different, but wouldn't
>
> !bash
>
> work just fine in vim?

What emacs lets you do is have a split screen, where one buffer is 
running a console and the other buffer is editing code.  In vim, you 
can't do this.  If you do :split and !bash (or :shell), the executed 
program will completely replace vim, rather than just running in the 
active buffer.  Supposedly the next vim will let this sort of thing 
work properly though.

>
> Although, I just have one gvim window open all the time and one
> terminal running screen.  Works for me.
>
Yeah, I tend to do work in console mode, so one vim with splits and 
vsplits (1280x1024 console), and a bunch of terminals work reasonably 
well.  Still, a properly embedded shell would be cool.