[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6675] Re: Suggestion for addition to Begin/End syntax

From: hipster <hipster@...4all.nl>
Date: 2000-11-30 14:03:34 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6675
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000  22:40:05 +0900, Andrew D. McDowell wrote:
[snip]
> Now imagine something like the above with 200 more lines of code
> between the end of the while block, and the end of the def block.
> 
> Because the 'end modifier' (sheez..what should this thing be called?)
> would have to match the block it's closing, the interpreter could 
> recognise that you were closing the wrong block.

I don't mean to be harsh, but adding syntactic sugar isn't going to
take the Code Smell--which is abundantly present--away. I'd suggest
refactoring until the meaning of each and every end is {n,cl}ear  ;)

	Michel

In This Thread