[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6033] Re: Ref.: Re: Time.local bug?

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-11-03 14:40:41 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6033
Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:6028] Ref.:  Re: Time.local bug?"
    on 00/11/03, David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@demasiado.com> writes:

|Also, ISO 8601,  allows hour '24' as a equivalent to  '00' and I have
|read  somewhere that  the may  be  a second  '61' some  times, but  I
|haven't found that in any official document, so there's nothing solid
|in that...

A second 61 means subsequent leap second, which is something like
urban legend.  So Ruby does not allow 61st second in the minute.
Thanks to Tadayoshi Funaba who teaches us a lot about time and
calendar.

|> Sorry...
|
|Mmmm... Are you guilty for that? If not, I don't think you should
|feel sorry, just worried like the rest of us ;-)

I AM guilty if there's something wrong ;-)

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next