[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6426] Re: Where is T_RANGE?

From: Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
Date: 2000-11-17 15:29:00 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6426
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> In message "[ruby-talk:6417] Where is T_RANGE?"
>     on 00/11/17, Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se> writes:
> 
> |Why T_ARRAY, T_HASH and so on but not T_RANGE? Is it there somewhere? If
> |not, why not?
> 
> Since Range uses T_OBJECT structure.
> 
Yeah, but is there any special reason (or is it a "development artefact")?

Is it ok to use the current T_X defined in ruby.h or might they change in
future version so that you should avoid using comparisons with TYPE()?

Regards,

Robert


In This Thread