[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6099] Re: detect:ifNone: in Ruby

From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-11-07 04:19:50 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6099
In message "[ruby-talk:6096] Re: detect:ifNone: in Ruby"
    on 00/11/07, Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:

|I guess that if the block form isn't important we _could_ just use
|'or'...
|
|        x = (a.detect {|i| i == 2} or 99)
|
|(btw. This is an interesting case where the precedence rules just
|can't win... ;-)

Try

        x = a.detect {|i| i == 2} || 99

but I admit it's more cryptic (closer to Perl ;-)

							matz.

In This Thread

Prev Next