[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6320] Re: [ruby-list:25865] Re: new host at ruby-lang.org (orrubyist.org)

From: "Conrad Schneiker/Austin/Contr/IBM" <schneik@...>
Date: 2000-11-13 19:58:26 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6320
Guy N. Hurst wrote,

# Conrad Schneiker/Austin/Contr/IBM wrote:
# > 
# > Guy N. Hurst writes:
# > ...
# > Hmm. Does this perhaps mean that in addition to:
# > ...
# > that we might soon be seeing:
# > 
# >   Subject:
# >         Dr. Dobb's Ruby-URL! - weekly Ruby news and links (Nov 20)
# > 
# > Just a thought....
# > 
# 
# That is very interesting - thanks for bringing this up.
# 
# I checked out the Python URL! and it looks like something close but
# not quite the same that I was thinking of. It simply gives a summary
# and then a link to the deja.com posting of a handful of posts.
# 
# I suppose it would be a good idea to ask the community just what
# they would expect, and what they would find useful, for something
# like this. Would Ruby-URL! be all that is needed? OR is there a
# need for an actual content summary with all relevent info in the
# email rather than just links to it?

I would like a URL + an actual content summary (which I expect would 
typically turn out to be the most useful). 

My hope is that Dr. Dobb's would provide quite a bit of discretion for 
supplementary comments. The reason for not doing this at present for 
Python and Tcl may be that it is a lot more work. ... Speaking of which, 
thanks in advance!

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)

In This Thread

Prev Next