[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6167] Re: mkmf: Why not have_library(lib, [funcs])?

From: Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
Date: 2000-11-08 11:31:39 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6167
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, ts wrote:

> R> Wouldn't it be nice to give an array of funcs (the ones you
> R> need in your extension)?
> 
>  I just need *one* library and if a function is in this library the other
>  functions, related to this library, are also in this library (no need to
>  make a check)
> 
Ok, I thought of it more like a simplistic version check so that you can
check that the stuff you use in a lib is actually there...

Thanks,

Robert


In This Thread

Prev Next