[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6668] Re: Suggestion for addition to Begin/End syntax

From: grady@... (Steven Grady)
Date: 2000-11-30 06:40:05 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6668
> Hi all.
> I'm very new to Ruby so this might be a bit of a shot in the dark, 
> but I'd like to suggest a minor change in the block 'end' syntax
> that may help readability.

On a similar note, has the possibility of using more traditional
brackets (i.e. "{" and "}") been discussed?  It would help those of
us who like to hit a key to jump to the other end of the current
block.  (I know, I know, in emacs you can do it -- you can do
anything in emacs -- but somtimes I happen to want to use vi..)

I assume there's no chance of this, since it would complicate the
syntax, it's not backwards-compatible, it would probably result in
ambiguities with procs and hashes , etc.  But I thought I'd mention it...
--
	Steven
"I was sad because I had no shoes until I met a man who had no feet and
I said, 'Got any shoes you're not using?'"

In This Thread

Prev Next