From: Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Date: 2000-11-22T06:09:34+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:6509] Re: redefining methods in a hierarchy.

Robert Feldt writes,

# On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Conrad Schneiker wrote:
# 
# > If every bit of progress helps, then with BitVector, Ruby's success is 
now 
# > assured. :-)
# > 
# I didn't get if you we're being ironical here?

No, it's just another bad programming pun that is pretty tenuously related 
to your example--i.e. 100,000 random bits (of progress) for the computing 
language world (which ultimately amounts to digital bit processing, 
implementation-wise).

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)