[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6383] 1.6.x documentation.

From: Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>
Date: 2000-11-15 10:53:21 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6383
On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

>
> There's only one reference for 1.6 now;  The Dave&Any book.
> Sorry for (mostly economical) inconvenience.
>
>                                                       matz.

On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:

> This one kind of snuck up on us, and we didn't have time to add it
> before printing.
>    
>      
> "If it's on paper, it's out of date"
> 

Given that:
    1.6 has new features over 1.4
        class variables, block_given?, ...;
    more people are joining the community because of the book;
    we are already discussing adding more features (when(nil), etc);
    people look on-line for information (as I did w/ Python [map, filter,
        reduce]);
    when people look on-line they will certainly look at ruby-lang.org;
    different slants on documentation may suit different people, so
	that whilest the library ref at rubycentral is excellent, there
        is room for "competing" documentation;
may I suggest that updates to the 1.4 docs at ruby-lang.org be accepted
so that they can be brought up to date with 1.6.x, and then used as
a basis for the preparation of /1\.[78]\.\d/ docs?  

	Hugh
	


In This Thread

Prev Next