From: ts Date: 2000-11-08T20:28:55+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:6166] Re: mkmf: Why not have_library(lib, [funcs])? >>>>> "R" == Robert Feldt writes: R> Why can you only test that one func is available with R> have_library? You want to test if a library is available. R> Wouldn't it be nice to give an array of funcs (the ones you R> need in your extension)? I just need *one* library and if a function is in this library the other functions, related to this library, are also in this library (no need to make a check) Guy Decoux