From: "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...>
Date: 2000-11-14T15:34:15+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:6347] Re: Another Smalltalk control structure idea

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> 
> The only reason I didn't put it in 1.5 (or 1.6) was I felt `inject'
> did not describe the behavior enough.  If you find the better name,
> I'll add it immediately (to 1.7 of course).  But I think you'll see it
> anyway in the future.
> 

I didn't really like the name 'inject' either.
But, since it reminds me of a recursive definition in math,
perhaps it could be called 'recurse'?


Guy N. Hurst
-- 
HurstLinks Web Development    http://www.hurstlinks.com/
Norfolk, VA - (757)623-9688
PHP/MySQL - Ruby/Perl - HTML/Javascript