[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6376] Re: Is xfree() the proper counter part to ALLOC_N() or ALLOC() ?

From: "Shigeo Kobayashi" <shigeo@...>
Date: 2000-11-15 03:53:24 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6376
Hi John,

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Small" <jsmall@laser.net>
Subject: [ruby-talk:6369] Is xfree() the proper counter part to ALLOC_N() or
ALLOC() ?

> If I use free() I get a runtime exception.
Yes(as far as you are using MSVC),the reason is the same as Perl's. See
 http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/id/D/DO/DOUGL/PerlCRT-README-2.05.txt

As same as Perl,you can use RubyCRT.Dll instead of MSVCRT.DLL
 ftp://ftp.netlab.co.jp/pub/lang/ruby/pc/RubyCRT-VC60SP4.zip

> Looking in ruby.h  I see  xfree() which seems to work okay, however I
don't
> read anything in readme.ext or Programming Ruby that indicates that this
is
> the preferred method.
Yes,if you prefer using MSVCRT.DLL,you must use xfree().

shigeo@tinyforest.gr.jp



In This Thread