[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6055] Re: Cygwin conflicts

From: Lewis Perin <perin@...>
Date: 2000-11-04 00:10:01 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6055
"Conrad Schneiker/Austin/Contr/IBM" <schneik@us.ibm.com> writes:

> [...CygWin Ruby installation woes...]

Maybe it's worth while taking a step back from the details of getting
Ruby (installation) to work in the Cygnus Win32 environment and
consider CygWin from the standpoint of, well, Ruby world domination.

Would Perl have the Win32 penetration it has without the ActiveState
native port?

Would Emacs have the Win32 penetration it has without the NTEmacs
port?

If the answers to the above are no and no, then should Ruby's future
on Win32 OSes (and possibly its future, period) be yoked to Cygnus?

/Lew, who uses Unix when he gets a chance:-)
-- 
Lew Perin / perin@mail.med.cornell.edu / perin@acm.org
www.panix.com/~perin/

In This Thread