[#6363] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — ts <decoux@...>

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

17 messages 2000/11/14
[#6367] Re: rescue clause affecting IO loop behavior — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2000/11/14

Hello again --

[#6582] best way to interleaf arrays? — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

15 messages 2000/11/26

[#6646] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

Ross asked something about widely known and largely ignored language (on

23 messages 2000/11/29
[#6652] RE: Array Intersect (&) question — rpmohn@... (Ross Mohn) 2000/11/29

aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com (Aleksi Niemel) wrote in

[#6723] Re: Array Intersect (&) question — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2000/12/01

> >Use a hash. Here's code to do both and more. It assumes that

[#6656] printing/accessing arrays and hashes — raja@... (Raja S.)

I'm coming to Ruby with a Python & Common Lisp background.

24 messages 2000/11/30

[ruby-talk:6031] Ref.: Re: Ref.: Re: Time.local bug?

From: David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Date: 2000-11-03 13:22:10 UTC
List: ruby-talk #6031
Hi there,

El Fri, 03 November 2000, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng escribi鷓

> On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Dave Thomas wrote:
> 
> >  Time.local 59, 49, 5, 3, 11, 2000, 5, 308, false, "CST"# => Fri Nov 03 05:49:59 CST 2000
> >  Time.local 60, 49, 5, 3, 11, 2000, 5, 308, false, "CST"# => Fri Nov 03 05:50:00 CST 2000
> 
> Doesn't this paragraph from RFC 1305:
> suggest that that is worng?  The time yielded should be 03 05:49:60, I
> think.  I'm no expert on this topic, though.

I agree with you... Leap seconds are real, like leap years are.. I mean, 2000-02-29 really is that, and not 2000-03-01, because this is a leap year... the same way, in a 'leap second' year, if they are inserted, they do exist as such and not representing the next second...

And returning to 24:00.... while such a time as '24:32' is recommended to be written as '00:31', '24:00' == '00:00 of the following day' is allowed and, actually, used when talking at future times... So you can talk of, eg, guard changes at 00:00, 06:00, 12:00, 18:00 and 24:00 hours every day...

See http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html for a brief explanation of ISO 8601...

regards,
david


----------------------------------------------------------------------
+  Mensaje enviado gracias al correo gratuito de Desmasiado Corp.    +
+                  http://correo.demasiado.com                       +
----------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In This Thread

Prev Next